Health-Smart for Weight Loss at UF Jax Clinics

Objectives: Aim 1 was to evaluate the effectiveness of the community health worker (CHW)-implemented, clinic-located, evidence-based, 6-month Health-Smart Weight Loss (HSWL) Program, as indicated by participants' mean weight loss. Aim 2 was to compare the outcomes of the following two 12-month, clinic-based weight loss maintenance programs implemented by patients' physicians after these patients completed the 6-month weight loss intervention: the physician-implemented Patient-Centered, Culturally Sensitive Weight Loss Maintenance (PCCS-WLM) intervention, and the Standard Behavioral Weight Loss Maintenance (SB-WLM) intervention. These two weight loss maintenance interventions differ in that the physicians who implemented the PCCS-WLM intervention were trained to display patient-identified, culturally sensitive behaviors and attitudes when talking with patients about their weight and to support patients' engagement in health promoting (health-smart) behaviors in order to promote patients' weight loss maintenance, whereas physicians in the SB-WLM intervention were trained to use behavioral change principles and skills as well as motivational interviewing approaches to behavior change in order to promote patients' weight loss maintenance. Aim 3 was to implement and evaluate a medical assistant-led program to integrate CHWs into health care teams. Methods: Participants were recruited from 21 primary care practices operated by an academic medical center. Participants' eligibility criteria were: Black women ages 21 years or older with a BMI of 30 kg/m2 or higher who had at least 2 clinic visits in the previous 24 months and were ready to change their diet and physical activity level. All participants received the 6-month CHW-implemented HSWL Program to address Aim 1. Therefore, results from baseline to 6 months are presented as one group. The study was constructed as a cluster-randomized trial to address Aim 2; thus, after the HSWL Program involving all participants was completed, clinics were randomized to the either the SB-WLM group or the PCCS-WLM group. Consequently, results after 6 months are presented separately for the two groups. Clinics were randomized with patients nested within clinic. To address Aim 1, a paired samples t-test and confidence interval of the proportion of the sample that achieved 5% or more weight loss by 6 months were used. To address Aim 2, a logistic regression with participants nested within clinics and Aim 2 study group as the independent variable was used. To address Aim 3, which was to evaluate integration of CHWs into the health care team, a virtual meeting was held with the CHWs who remained at the end of the study (n=8) for the purpose of asking exploratory semi-structured questions about the clinical staff behaviors that helped them feel or not feel integrated into the clinical team and to identify what would improve and/or sustain integration of CHWs into the clinical team. Content analysis using the constant comparison method was applied to the responses of the CHWs to the semi-structured questions asked. The communications and follow-through subscale of the TeamSTEPPS Assessment Tool was used to assess communication among the clinic staff as viewed by the participating clinic staff as a group and CHWs as a group. Mean ratings of responses to this subscale for each of these groups were calculated.