Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
POstopeRative Standardization of Care: THe Implementation of Best Practice After Pancreatic Resection. a Nationwide Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial
This Nationwide stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial is designed to evaluate if the implementation of a best practice algorithm for postoperative care results in a decrease in incidence of major complications and death after pancreatic resection as compared to current practice.
Rationale Pancreatic resection is a major abdominal operation with 50% chance of postoperative complications. A feared complication is severe pancreatic fistula, in which there is leakage of enzyme rich fluid into the abdominal cavity. Adequate complication management appears to be the most important factor in improving outcomes of patients undergoing pancreatic resection. Objective To investigate whether implementation of a best practice algorithm for postoperative care focusing on early detection and step-up management of postoperative pancreatic fistula results in a lower rate of major complications and death after pancreatic resection as compared to current practice Study design A nationwide stepped-wedge, cluster randomized, superiority trial. In this design all participating centers cross over from current practice to best practice according to the algorithm, but are randomized to determine the exact order. At the end of the trial, all centers will have implemented the best practice algorithm. Study population All centers performing pancreatic surgery in the Netherlands (i.e. the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group). Intervention Cluster level education on postoperative care according to a best practice algorithm, focusing on early detection and step-up management of postoperative pancreatic fistula. This algorithm is based on findings in Dutch observational cohort studies, systematic literature analyses, an inventory in current protocols on postoperative care and expert opinion. The proposed algorithm is validated in a multicenter cohort and consensus upon this algorithm is reached with pancreatic surgeons from all centers of the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group. The final algorithm was reviewed critically by the advisory committee of internationally respected experts in the field of pancreatology before implementation in this trial. Comparison Postoperative care according to current practice. Endpoints The primary outcome was measured in all patients undergoing pancreatic resection and is a composite of major complications (i.e. postpancreatectomy bleeding, new-onset organ failure and death). Secondary endpoints include the individual components of the primary endpoint and other clinical outcomes, number of patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, healthcare resource utilization and costs analysis. Follow-up will be 90 days after pancreatic resection.
Age
All ages
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis
's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands
Academic Medical Center
Amsterdam, Netherlands
Onze Lieve Vrouwen Gasthuis
Amsterdam, Netherlands
VUmc
Amsterdam, Netherlands
Amphia ziekenhuis
Breda, Netherlands
Reinier de Graaf gasthuis
Delft, Netherlands
Catharina ziekenhuis
Eindhoven, Netherlands
Medisch Spectrum Twente
Enschede, Netherlands
UMCG
Groningen, Netherlands
Tjongerschans
Heerenveen, Netherlands
Start Date
January 8, 2018
Primary Completion Date
November 9, 2019
Completion Date
February 9, 2020
Last Updated
June 14, 2019
1,600
ESTIMATED participants
Best practice algorithm for postoperative care
OTHER
Lead Sponsor
St. Antonius Hospital
Collaborators
NCT05053971
NCT04550494
Data Source & Attribution
This clinical trial information is sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov, a service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health.
Modifications: This data has been reformatted for display purposes. Eligibility criteria have been parsed into inclusion/exclusion sections. Location data has been geocoded to enable distance-based search. For the authoritative and most current information, please visit ClinicalTrials.gov.
Neither the United States Government nor Clareo Health make any warranties regarding the data. Check ClinicalTrials.gov frequently for updates.
View ClinicalTrials.gov Terms and Conditions