Image-guided Cochlear Implant Programming (IGCIP)

Over 320,000 individuals have received cochlear implants (CIs) to restore hearing to the hearing impaired. Commercially available CIs have 12, 16, or 22 independent electrodes (the number is dependent on the manufacturer of the CI) which cover the entire frequency spectrum of the cochlea from 20,000 Hertz (Hz) at the base of to 200Hz at the apex. After implantation, an audiologist individually adjusts stimulation levels of each electrode following which all electrodes are turned on such that the whole frequency spectrum of speech can be appreciated. This is known as "standard of care" (SOC) programming. While postoperative speech understanding is significantly better than preoperative levels, even the best performers complain that the fidelity of natural hearing is not reproduced. Additionally, a significant minority achieves poor outcomes despite normally functioning equipment for reasons that are unknown but likely relate to poor neural survival; however, this cannot be confirmed as postmortem histopathology is required to accurately document spiral ganglion cell count. In recent years much attention has focused on the interface between the cochlear implant electrodes and the auditory neurons they are stimulating. Technological improvements at Vanderbilt in imaging processing have made it possible to determine the location of each electrode array in relationship to the frequency spectrum of the cochlea. Using this information, the investigators have developed a new method of CI programming which they call image-guided cochlear implant programming, or IGCIP in which sub-optimally placed electrodes are turned-off or deactivated. Sub-optimally placed electrodes are defined as ones for which their neighboring electrodes are in closer proximity to the site of their neural stimulation. By deactivating sub-optimally positioned electrodes, channel interaction is reduced allowing a cleaner signal to be presented to the auditory nerve. The purpose of the study is to prospectively collect audiological outcomes on patients undergoing IGCIP. The investigators hypothesize that CI recipients will perform better with IGCIP as compared to SOC. Cochlear implant recipients who have reached asymptotic improvement in performance with SOC will be offered enrollment. They will undergo post-operative CT scanning to determine the relationship between the cochlear implant electrodes and the neural interface. Recommendations regarding deactivation of sub-optimally placed electrodes will be communicated to the audiology team who, if in their clinical judgement deems deactivation of these electrodes reasonable, will implement the changes for a 1 month trial. The participant will return at 1 month to have audiological assessment as per the clinical standard of care. Based on these results, which will be shared with the patient, the patient can choose to use IGCIP or SOC for long term cochlear implant programming.