Chronic pain impacts the daily lives of fully one-third of Americans over the age of 45, with prevalence expected to increase as the population ages. In well-intended and industry-driven efforts to provide relief to chronic pain sufferers, the prescription of opioids has increased dramatically since the turn of the century, such that it is currently estimated that between 5 and 8 million Americans use opioids on a daily basis for chronic pain management. Yet, prescription opioid therapy for chronic pain is not an evidence-based intervention. In fact, as evaluation data accumulate, it is becoming clear that outcomes are often poorer for patients on opioid therapy, and that improvements are appreciated when tapered off the medications. In the midst of an "epidemic of prescription drug abuse" it is critical that opioid prescription practices be evidence-based and delivered "in the best possible manner that maximizes effectiveness and minimizes harm".
A theorized explanation for poorer outcomes (functionality, quality of life) for patients on opioid therapy is the phenomenon of opioid-induced hyperalgesia (OIH). Well-demonstrated in animal and inferred in patients, ongoing opioid use results in increased sensitivity to experimental pain, which, in the case of the chronic pain patient, is believed to interfere with (if not preclude) desired pain relief outcomes. However, the causal relationship between opioid discontinuation and OIH has received little empirical attention, such that it is not clear the degree to which opioid taper improves pain responses and outcomes, if at all. Evidence supporting that prescription opioids makes the pain experience worse for chronic pain patients would support a sea change in current practice of chronic opioid therapy.
Studying the direct effects of an opioid taper on pain responses in chronic pain patients is challenging; complicated by the reemergence of pain, variable compliance with taper and concomitant increased use of non-opioid pain medications, a controlled examination of pain responses during and following opioid detoxification is not immediately tenable in this patient population. Thus, funded is a proof-of concept trial to identify and characterize the direct effects of opioid detoxification on experimental pain responses in opioid-dependent patients without chronic pain to establish if, in fact, a notable effect size can be discerned. If supported, these findings will provide a foundation upon which to predict efficacy in patients with the more complicated picture of chronic pain.
Specifically, in a well-characterized sample of men and women seeking addiction treatment in a residential setting, experimental pain responses will be serially described over the course of and for three months following a standard observed opioid (buprenorphine) taper, and compared to those of matched control patients initiated on buprenorphine maintenance therapy. Pain responses will be measured with two valid and reliable experimental pain induction techniques commonly used to measure OIH (cold-pressor, quantitative sensory testing), and subject-level predictors of response identified.
