Safety and Efficacy Study of Topically Applied DS107 Cream in Mild to Moderate Atopic Dermatitis Patients (AD)

This was a randomized, vehicle-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter, Phase 2b study to investigate the safety and efficacy of topically administered DS107 cream and the dose-response relationship between DS107 cream and vehicle cream in patients 18 years and older with mild to moderate AD. Approximately 300 patients (100 per treatment group), with mild to moderate AD were to be included in this study. All patients signed the patient information sheet (PIS)/informed consent form (ICF) and underwent screening for study eligibility. Eligible patients were randomized (1:1:1) to receive 1% DS107 cream, 5% DS107 cream or, vehicle cream: Treatment Group A: 1% DS107 cream Treatment Group B: 5% DS107 cream Treatment Group C: Vehicle cream Study cream was to be applied topically to all affected or commonly affected areas twice daily (BID) for 8 weeks. To maintain the double-blind conditions, the DS107 and vehicle creams were identical in appearance. During their participation, patients were to come to the clinic on 7 occasions: Screening, Baseline, and at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8 (end of treatment), and 10 (follow-up). At the start of the study, areas for treatment were defined, DS107 or vehicle cream was then applied to those areas (and any newly affected areas) throughout the 8-week treatment period. Patients were instructed to apply the study cream liberally to the affected area in the morning and the evening. Emollients could be applied to other areas of dry skin that were not in the defined treatment area. On the days of clinic visits, patients were instructed to abstain from applying study cream for 6 hours prior to the visit and then to apply study cream as soon as possible after the clinic visit. Once enrolled, patients were restricted from using any other treatment for AD. Any medication (prescription and over-the-counter \[OTC\] drugs) or therapeutic intervention deemed necessary for the patient, and which in the opinion of the investigator did not interfere with the safety and efficacy evaluations, could be continued unless they were included in the prohibited list of medications and therapeutic regimens.