Real-time Intraoperative Breast Cancer Visualization for Margin Assessment

A rolling six design which is intended for relatively safe trials and shortening the study duration is proposed for the phase 1 portion 74. In the rolling six design, three to six patients can be enrolled to a dose each time. The dose de-escalation occurs when two or more DLT occur at a dose level while dose escalation occurs when 3/3, 4/4, 5/5, 5/6 or 6/6 patients are evaluated without DLT 75. Three dose levels will be tested in the phase I study, 0.05, 0.075 and 0.10 mg/kg. LS301 will be administered intravenously at a starting dose of 0.05 mg/kg to a cohort of six patients and escalate/de-escalate following the decision rule of the rolling six design. Once six patients have been included at the current dose level, inclusions are suspended until at least five of the six patients have completed the procedure without DLT observed in the evaluation period. MTD is hit where two or more patients out of six at a dose level experience DLT. The investigators do not expect any serious adverse events related to LS301 at the initial Dose Level 1. Once the MTD is determined, an expansion cohort with 9 patients will be tested at the MTD and an optimal imaging dose will be recommended for the subsequent phase II trial. At the completion of the expansion cohort, a single arm phase 2 trial will be performed at the optimal imaging dose. A breast surgeon will perform breast conserving surgery per standard of care. At the completion of the surgery, a second investigator (to reduce bias in data collection) will wear the cancer vision goggle (CVG) to visualize the excised tissue to determine if there are any positive margins based on the presence of LS301 fluorescence. If any positive margins are observed, the subject will be considered to have a positive margin; otherwise, the margin is considered negative. The excised tissue will later be examined by a breast cancer pathologist. Standard pathologic techniques will be used to determine if there are positive margins. Particular attention will be paid to the sites marked following CVG assessment to confirm whether the margin is positive or negative at any of these sites, or positive at other locations not identified by CVG. No interventions will be allowed based on the CVG results. This study was initiated at Washington University in St. Louis and is being transferred to UTSW. Phase 1a was initiated at Washington University in St. Louis where 9 subjects were enrolled. The PI is continuing with Phase 1B at UTSW where 9 more subjects will be enrolled. Once completed, the results of Phase 1 (a and b) will be sent to the FDA for review. Phase II will begin once the FDA has reviewed the interim data and authorized Phase II to open. After phase 1 data has been submitted to and discussed with the FDA, an additional cohort of 88 patients will be enrolled to the phase 2 portion of the trial to assess the diagnostic capabilities of LS301 for identification of positive margins at surgery. FDA-approved fluorescence imaging systems may be used to benchmark CVG data.