Preventing UTIs in Chronic Neurogenic Bladder Dysfunction (Mix Methods)

Each year in the UK 1,200 people sustain a spinal cord injury, 600 people will be diagnosed with cauda equina syndrome, 6,000 with multiple sclerosis and 300 with transverse myelitis. These four patient groups all suffer from neurological disorders of the spinal cord, resulting in loss of normal bladder function known as neurogenic bladder dysfunction. This in turn can lead to urinary tract infections (UTIs). UTIs are a commonly recurring and debilitating complication, with spinal patients experiencing 2.5 episodes per patient per year on average. This not only results in 16% of hospital readmissions and costs of care of up to £125 million spent by the NHS on treating UTIs every year, but also has a dramatic impact on patients' quality of life. A recent NICE guideline highlighted the methodological difficulties of research into the prevention of UTIs in patients with neurogenic bladder dysfunction. Given that this group of patients normally do not feel symptoms like 'pain' and 'a frequent urge to urinate', it can be difficult to distinguish between bladder colonisation (asymptomatic bacteriuria) and true infection (a symptomatic UTI). To date, there is no clear agreement among experts on which signs and symptoms are indicative of a symptomatic UTI. Although strong evidence is lacking, antibiotics have been widely used for the prevention of recurrent UTIs in patients with neurogenic bladder dysfunction. However, this approach is now being called into question as antibiotic resistance has become a world-wide health concern. In the recently published 'UK Five Year Antimicrobial Resistance Strategy', policy makers stressed the importance of research into alternative preventative treatments. Immunotherapy potentially offers such a (cost-) effective alternative to antibiotic therapy for UTI management. At least 83% of community-acquired complicated UTIs are caused by Escherichia coli (E. coli). Uro-Vaxom® (OM-Pharma, Switzerland) is an orally administered, bacterial vaccine which consists of a 6mg lyophilised (heat-inactivated) mix of E. coli membrane glycoproteins. Previous studies showed that Uro-Vaxom® resulted in a significant reduction of UTIs in otherwise healthy women with recurrent cystitis, as well as being safe to use. Before investigating the effects of this promising new vaccine in patients with neurogenic bladder dysfunction, two crucial issues will need to be clarified. First, consensus must be reached on how to measure a symptomatic UTI in this group of patients. Second, the feasibility of carrying out a larger, definitive randomised controlled trial on the prevention of symptomatic UTI in patients with neurogenic bladder dysfunction must be established. The central aim of the proposed mixed method study is to clarify these two key methodological and feasibility issues. In the first stage of this study is to carry out qualitative interviews to explore patient experiences and views of symptoms and signs associated with a UTI. These results, combined with findings from a literature review, will enable the design of a quantitative patient survey which will be distributed by four service user organisations to people with neurogenic bladder dysfunction. Finally, taking the results from all preceding stages, a final definition, or algorithm, will be discussed before and during a consensus meeting. In the second stage of this study, a small-scale parallel, double-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial will be conducted to investigate the feasibility of carrying out a larger well-powered study on the prevention of symptomatic UTI in patients with neurogenic bladder dysfunction. Forty-eight patients will be randomly assigned treatment with Uro-Vaxom®, or placebo, for 3 months and followed-up for a further 3 months. This is to expose any pitfalls or areas requiring re-designing, such as logistics, recruitment and compliance rates, in order to refine the protocol of a definitive clinical trial.