The use of HTS after DCL may decrease the rate of failure to achieve PFC and reduce the number of complications associated with an open abdomen.
Research Questions:
1. Primary Objective: Is there a higher rate of PFC among patients who undergo DCL and temporary abdominal closure when using HTS versus standard crystalloid resuscitation?
2. Secondary Objectives: Does successful and faster PFC reduce ICU, ventilator and hospital days?
3. Does faster and more successful PFC result in lower morbidity to include enterocutaneous fistula (ECF), intra-abdominal abscess (IAA), abdominal wall hernia, and anastomotic failure?
DCL is a common procedure wounded warriors undergo due to blast and other blunt and penetrating mechanisms of injury. This results in a significant population of warriors at risk for all of the complications and comorbidities that accompany an open abdomen. Thus, finding ways to not only achieve PFC but also to decrease the time to PFC will reduce these unwanted events.
The protocol design is a multi-institutional, prospective, double blind, randomized controlled trial of patients who undergo DCL for abdominal trauma requiring temporary abdominal closure and return to operating room for definitive treatment. All participating facilities are Level I Trauma Centers. Currently, the standard of care for damage control resuscitation involves all intravenous fluid solutions utilized in this study; normal saline, Ringer's lactate, Plasmalyte, and 3% saline (HTS). However, the type of fluid is selected based on surgeon preference alone. Investigators will randomize patients to normal saline at a resuscitation rate of 30 cc/hr or to 3% saline (HTS) at a resuscitation rate of 30cc/hr which will be initiated upon arrival to the ICU.
