Rationale: Opioids are traditionally accepted as a cornerstone of acute pain management in the Emergency Department (ED). Morphine is one of the most commonly used parenteral opioid analgesics whose initial dose of 0.1 mg/kg has been extensively researched and recommended for control of severe acute pain in the ED. However, intravenous administration of opioids is associated with thefollowing side effects: hypotension, respiratory depression, dizziness, pruritis and nausea. In addition, in patients with pre-existing renal and/or hepatic insufficiency, these effects may be pronounced and require interventions. Thus, the administration of an equipotent analgesic that does not cause hypotension and respiratory depression would enhance patient safety in the ED.
Ketamine is a noncompetitive N-methyl D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist that blocks the release of excitatory neurotransmitter glutamate and provides anesthesia, amnesia and analgesia by virtue of decreasing central sensitization and "wind-up" phenomenon. Due to its high lipid solubility, ketamine rapidly crosses the blood-brain barrier, provides rapid onset of action (peak concentration at is reached 1 minute after IVP) and rapid recovery to baseline (duration of action 5-15 minutes after IVP) (1). When given at subdissociative doses of 0.1-0.5 mg/kg, either as an adjunct to opioid analgesic or as a solo agent, ketamine provides good analgesia while preserving airway patency, ventilation, and cardiovascular stability (2). In addition, a small dose of ketamine may increase the analgesic potency of opioids thus decreasing their dosing requirements (3). Based on the aforementioned facts, ketamine offers an attractive option for providing safe and convenient pain control for patients in the ED.
A double-blind trial of 40 adult patients with acute musculoskeletal trauma compared low-dose ketamine administered by subcutaneous infusion (0.1 mg/kg/h) with intermittent intravenous morphine (0.1 mg/kg IV every 4 hours ) and demonstrated better pain relief, less sedation and less nausea and vomiting with ketamine infusion than with intermittent morphine. In addition, none of the patients in the ketamine group required supplementary analgesia (4). A prospective, randomized trial compared two analgesic regimens, morphine with ketamine (K group) or morphine with placebo (P group) for severe acute pain in 73 trauma patients with a visual analog scale (VAS) score of at least 60/100. Morphine was administered at 0.1mg/kg; patients in the K group received 0.2 mg/kg of intravenous ketamine over 10 minutes while patients in the P group received isotonic sodium chloride solution. The results showed comparable change in VAS score at 30 minutes (34 mm (K) vs. 39 mm (P)) but reduced morphine consumption in the ketamine group (0.14 mg/kg (K) vs 0.2 mg/kg (P)) (5).
A chart review analysis of 35 ED patients receiving low dose ketamine at doses 0.1mg-0.6mg/kg in addition to intravenous morphine demonstrated a decrease in pain intensity for 54% of the patients by a documented 3 point pain decrease on a 10-point scale. The ketamine doses ranged from 5 mg to 35 mg with median dose of 10 mg and mean dose of 15.7mg. In addition, only one patient had a brief dysphoric reaction that did not require intervention (6).
Hypothesis: Intravenous administration of subdissociative dose ketamine at 0.3 mg/kg is superior to intravenous morphine at 0.1 mg/kg in treating moderate and severe acute pain in patients presenting to the ED.
Methods: Prospective, randomized, double-blind trial evaluating and comparing analgesic effect of intravenous Ketamine administered in sub-dissociative doses: 0.3 mg/kg given over 10 minutes with intravenous Morphine given at 0.1mg/kg as a single IVP.
Description: Once patient is triaged, an initial pain score will be assessed and patient's stated weight will be recorded in the chart. Patients will then have an initial evaluation by an attending ED physician and once found to be eligible for the study (deemed by treating physician to warrant administration of intravenous analgesia) patient will be randomized to receive either morphine at 0.1 mg /kg given as IVP or ketamine at 0.3 mg/given as IVP. Patients' vital signs will be recorded at triage, at the beginning of the study and at 15, 30, 60, 90, 120 minutes post-administration. Patients will be placed on a monitor and continuous pulse oximetry (oxygen saturation), blood pressure, heart rate and respiratory rate will be recorded. We will compare efficacy as a difference between 2 groups in pain relief from the baseline (at triage) to 30 minutes post-analgesic administration. The primary outcome is the difference between 2 groups in pain relief at 30 minutes. The secondary outcome is side effects. We will compare the safety profile of each analgesic with respect to incidence of hypotension, respiratory depression, nausea and vomiting, pruritis, need for an opioid reversal agent (naloxone), tachycardia, laryngospasm, hypersalivation, dizziness, agitation and need for benzodiazepines (midazolam) administration for symptomatic evidence of emergence reaction. All the data will be entered and analyzed via SPSS. Data analyses will include frequency distributions, and ANOVA to assess a difference in pain scores between the groups at various time points. All patients will be analyzed with an intent to treat analysis. However, a subgroup analysis will be done for any emergence reaction or event which occurs often.
