Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
Bedside Silo Versus Attempted Operative Closure for Gastroschisis
The objective of this study is to scientifically evaluate two different closure strategies for gastroschisis to determine if there is a difference in the two approaches.
The hypothesis is that there is no difference between bedside silo placement and operative closure in return of bowel function, ventilator dependence, or length of stay. The primary outcome variable between the two techniques will be length of hospitalization. The likely variables will be length of time to meet discharge criteria, length of hospitalization, time to full feedings, time on mechanical ventilation and total hospital charges.
Age
0 - 0 years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No
Children's Mercy Hospital
Kansas City, Missouri, United States
Start Date
August 1, 2011
Primary Completion Date
January 1, 2018
Completion Date
April 1, 2018
Last Updated
January 10, 2019
38
ACTUAL participants
silo for gastroschisis
PROCEDURE
Primary closure of gastroschisis
PROCEDURE
Lead Sponsor
Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City
NCT06878950
NCT02774746
NCT06731855
Data Source & Attribution
This clinical trial information is sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov, a service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health.
Modifications: This data has been reformatted for display purposes. Eligibility criteria have been parsed into inclusion/exclusion sections. Location data has been geocoded to enable distance-based search. For the authoritative and most current information, please visit ClinicalTrials.gov.
Neither the United States Government nor Clareo Health make any warranties regarding the data. Check ClinicalTrials.gov frequently for updates.
View ClinicalTrials.gov Terms and Conditions