Randomized Isoflurane and Sevoflurane Comparison in Cardiac Surgery

Current evidence supports the superiority of sevoflurane for myocardial protection during cardiac surgery when compared to total intravenous anesthesia with propofol. However, there is no evidence to suggest that sevoflurane is superior to isoflurane for myocardial protection during cardiac surgery. Sevoflurane may potentially reduce the rate of post-cardiac surgery atrial fibrillation and the time to tracheal extubation compared to isoflurane, but the literature is equivocal on these two important outcomes. Anesthesiologists still frequently use isoflurane for maintenance of cardiac anesthesia, and this is likely because there is substantial uncertainty about whether or not sevoflurane is superior to isoflurane, given the lack of head-to-head RCTs. A large, prospective, pragmatic RCT can ultimately assist clinicians by providing evidence of the non-inferiority (or, possibly the superiority) of one anesthetic compared to the other on important patient outcomes such as ICU length of stay, mortality, renal dysfunction, time to tracheal extubation after cardiac surgery, rates of clinically-important atrial fibrillation, and myocardial damage.