Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Trial Comparing Laparoscopy VS Conventional Mesh Repair of Incisional and Umbilical Hernia
The aim of this study is to compare immediate and long-term (24 months) results of laparoscopic and open mesh repair of incisional and umbilical hernia.
The aim of this study is to compare immediate and long-term (24 months) results of laparoscopic and open mesh repair of incisional and umbilical hernia. Five hundred patients will be included in this randomized, multicentric trial. Hypotheses are that laparoscopic approach: 1- reduces immediate parietal complications without increasing intra abdominal septic complications 2- is less invasive and also reduces patients' hospital stay and recovery time; 3- has the same efficacy, than open approach.
Age
18 - 85 years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No
Hôpital Jean Verdier, department of digestive and general surgery
Bondy, France
Start Date
November 1, 2009
Primary Completion Date
April 1, 2011
Completion Date
April 1, 2013
Last Updated
June 18, 2021
98
ACTUAL participants
Laparoscopic mesh hernia repair
PROCEDURE
Open anterior approach
PROCEDURE
Lead Sponsor
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
NCT07476560
NCT07327463
Data Source & Attribution
This clinical trial information is sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov, a service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health.
Modifications: This data has been reformatted for display purposes. Eligibility criteria have been parsed into inclusion/exclusion sections. Location data has been geocoded to enable distance-based search. For the authoritative and most current information, please visit ClinicalTrials.gov.
Neither the United States Government nor Clareo Health make any warranties regarding the data. Check ClinicalTrials.gov frequently for updates.
View ClinicalTrials.gov Terms and Conditions