Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
Nucleoside-Sparing Combination Therapy With Lopinavir/Ritonavir (LPV/r) + Raltegravir (RAL) vs. Efavirenz (EFV) + Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate + Emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) in Antiretroviral-Naïve Patients
CCTG 589 is a randomized, open-label, pilot study comparing the efficacy, safety and tolerability of RAL plus LPV/r to EFV plus TDF/FTC in HIV-infected, treatment-naïve subjects. Subjects will be ineligible if they have any evidence of drug resistant virus in the past or at the time of screening (if never previously tested). Those who are found to be eligible will be randomized 1:1 to initiate either LPV/r (400/100 mg) plus RAL (400mg), both given twice-daily, or fixed dose combination of EFV (600 mg), TDF (300 mg) and FTC (200 mg) given as once-daily Atripla® for 48 weeks. Hypotheses 1. The novel nucleoside-sparing combination of LPV/r + RAL will have a faster phase 1 viral decay rate compared to standard-of-care therapy with EFV/TDF/FTC in antiretroviral-naïve patients. 1. Faster phase 1 viral decay dynamics will be associated with improved longer-term (week 48) viral suppression. 2. Faster phase 1 viral decay dynamics will be associated with accelerated early (Day 0-14) clearance of cell-associated HIV DNA. 3. Faster phase 1 viral decay dynamics will be associated with greater early (baseline to week 12) CD4+ T-cell recovery. 2. The LPV/r + RAL arm will have greater decreases in early (baseline to week 4) CD4/CD8 T-cell immune activation and apoptosis which will be associated with greater late (week 12 to week 48) CD4+ T-cell recovery. 3. Subjects treated with LPV/r + RAL arm will have smaller changes in total cholesterol and triglycerides from baseline than those receiving EFV/TDF/FTC.
The purpose of this study is to determine how well a new anti-HIV drug combination (RAL plus LPV/r) taken twice a day decreases the amount of HIV found in participants' blood (viral load) compared to taking the once-a-day combination pill Atripla®. This study will also try to determine if the new combination has fewer side effects and is tolerated better than Atripla®. Another reason this study is being done is to see if this new drug combination helps participants' body's CD4 cells recover differently and will also look at how well participants' bodies absorbs these drugs and how safe these drugs are when given together.
Age
18 - No limit years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No
Living Hope Clinical Foundation
Long Beach, California, United States
University Southern California
Los Angeles, California, United States
Univerisity California Irvine
Orange, California, United States
Desert AIDS Project
Palm Springs, California, United States
University California San Diego
San Diego, California, United States
Harbor-UCLA
Torrance, California, United States
Start Date
August 26, 2008
Primary Completion Date
May 5, 2011
Completion Date
February 11, 2014
Last Updated
July 22, 2020
51
ACTUAL participants
Kaletra + Isentress
DRUG
Atripla
DRUG
Lead Sponsor
University of California, San Diego
Collaborators
NCT06694805
NCT04142047
Data Source & Attribution
This clinical trial information is sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov, a service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health.
Modifications: This data has been reformatted for display purposes. Eligibility criteria have been parsed into inclusion/exclusion sections. Location data has been geocoded to enable distance-based search. For the authoritative and most current information, please visit ClinicalTrials.gov.
Neither the United States Government nor Clareo Health make any warranties regarding the data. Check ClinicalTrials.gov frequently for updates.
View ClinicalTrials.gov Terms and ConditionsNCT07428330