Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
Prospective Comparison of Cyanoacrylate Tissue Adhesive (Dermabond) and Suture (Vicryl) for Closure of Cardiac Device Pockets
The purpose of this study is to determine whether cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive is as effective as polyglactin 910 suture for surgical closure of cardiac device pockets.
Age
21 - No limit years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No
Mayo Clinic
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Start Date
May 1, 2008
Primary Completion Date
May 1, 2009
Completion Date
May 1, 2009
Last Updated
December 29, 2010
103
ACTUAL participants
Cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive (Dermabond)
DEVICE
Polyglactin 910 suture (Vicryl)
DEVICE
Lead Sponsor
Mayo Clinic
NCT07241390
NCT03372733
Data Source & Attribution
This clinical trial information is sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov, a service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health.
Modifications: This data has been reformatted for display purposes. Eligibility criteria have been parsed into inclusion/exclusion sections. Location data has been geocoded to enable distance-based search. For the authoritative and most current information, please visit ClinicalTrials.gov.
Neither the United States Government nor Clareo Health make any warranties regarding the data. Check ClinicalTrials.gov frequently for updates.
View ClinicalTrials.gov Terms and ConditionsNCT06909773