Loading clinical trials...

COMPLETEDPHASE2

Effect of Prucalopride in Patients With Severe Chronic Idiopathic Constipation

A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of R093877 in Patients With Severe Chronic Constipation

NCT00576511•Movetis

View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether prucalopride is safe and effective in patients with severe chronic constipation.

Detailed Description

This is a phase II trial with a parallel-group design, consisting of a run-in phase (phase I), followed by a placebo controlled double-blind phase (phase 2). Patients will receive either R093877 4 mg or placebo o.d. for a period of 4 weeks. Phase 1 is a run-in period of 4 weeks duration, during which the bowel habit is documented and the existence of constipation determined. If the definition of constipation was not met during the 4 weeks of the run-in period, double-blind treatment will not be started. Phase 2 is a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase, in which patients will be treated for 4 weeks with either 4 mg of R093877 or placebo given o.d. (two capsules of 2 mg are taken before breakfast).

Eligibility

Age

18 - 75 years

Sex

ALL

Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria

•Patients were eligible for inclusion if they were aged 18-75 years with a history of constipation, defined as the occurrence 2 of the following criteria during the previous 6 months or more:
•* 2 spontaneous (i.e. not induced by a laxative within 24 hours) bowel movements per week;
•* 25% of stools were lumpy and/or hard;
•* sensation of incomplete evacuation following 25% of stool;
•* straining at defaecation for 25% of the time.
•All the patients screened for the study were dependent on osmotic laxatives (macrogol, milk of magnesia, lactulose), paraffin oil, glycerol or stimulant laxatives (antranoids, diphenylmethanes) given orally or rectally. The osmotic laxatives were taken on a daily base while the stimulant laxatives were restricted to 2, eventually 3 intakes per week. And although these laxatives, all or not combined promoted defaecation in the majority of patients, these regimens did not provide relief of constipation symptoms in none of the patients. Furthermore, many patients reported that the effect of the laxatives declined over time, that the intake of even stimulant laxatives was not consistently followed by rectal evacuation or that the intake of even stimulant laxatives was not consistently followed by rectal evacuation of that the dose and frequency of intake of laxatives had to be limited because of intolerable side effects including vomiting and abdominal cramps.
•Eligible patients were also required to have constipation causing disability, with the patient's occupational, social and recreational activities governed by constipation and efforts to attain relief, and to have poor results with laxative treatment and diet counseling as determined by physician interview.
•Patients also had to have a normal electromyographic inhibition pattern of the external anal sphincter during straining (assessed at the start of the treatment phase) and an absence of organic abnormalities of the colon (as assessed by barium enema or total colonoscopy).

Exclusion Criteria

•Drug-induced constipation
•Secondary causes of constipation
•Known or suspected organic large bowel disorders
•Congenital or acquired megacolon/megarectum
•History of previous abdominal surgery
•Evidence of a non-relaxing pelvic floor as the main cause of constipation
•Active proctological conditions
•Impaired renal function or clinically significant abnormalities of blood chemistry, hematology, urinalysis or ECG.
•Patients who were pregnant, breast feeding, not using acceptable methods of birth control or who had known illnesses or conditions that might interfere with adequate assessment of the study drug were also excluded.

Key Dates

Start Date

December 1, 1994

Primary Completion Date

February 1, 1996

Completion Date

February 1, 1996

Last Updated

May 29, 2008

Enrollment

ACTUAL participants

Conditions

Chronic Constipation

Interventions

prucalopride

DRUG

placebo

DRUG

Exploring the Potential Benefits of Probiotic Yogurt

NCT06847919

Chronic Constipation

View study

RECRUITINGNA

Sacral Neuromodulation as Treatment for Chronic Constipation

NCT03819062

Chronic Constipation

View study

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITINGNA

"Which Type of Exercise is More Effective in Chronic Constipation?

NCT06354855

Chronic Constipation

Data Source & Attribution

This clinical trial information is sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov, a service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health.

ClinicalTrials.gov last update: May 29, 2008Data synced to Clareo: March 29, 2026

Modifications: This data has been reformatted for display purposes. Eligibility criteria have been parsed into inclusion/exclusion sections. Location data has been geocoded to enable distance-based search. For the authoritative and most current information, please visit ClinicalTrials.gov.

Neither the United States Government nor Clareo Health make any warranties regarding the data. Check ClinicalTrials.gov frequently for updates.

View ClinicalTrials.gov Terms and Conditions

Effect of Prucalopride in Patients With Severe Chronic Idiopathic Constipation

Inclusion Criteria

Exclusion Criteria

Exploring the Potential Benefits of Probiotic Yogurt

Sacral Neuromodulation as Treatment for Chronic Constipation

"Which Type of Exercise is More Effective in Chronic Constipation?

Validation of New Type Radiopaque Marker in The Evaluation of Colonic Transit Time

Efficacy of Linaclotide in Type II Diabetics With Chronic Constipation

Effectiveness and Safety of Probiotic in Regulating Chronic Constipation