Loading clinical trials...

Biventricular Alternative Pacing | Clinical Trials | Clareo Health

WITHDRAWNPHASE4

Biventricular Alternative Pacing

Better Pacing - Biventricular Pacing as Alternative Method in Patients With Disturbances of AV Conduction and Preserved LV Function

NCT00559143•Medtronic Hellas Medical Devices ΑEE

View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Summary

Aim of present study is to examine the short and long-term results of pacing from right ventricular apex and to compare them with those of biventricular pacing.

Detailed Description

In this study all subjects to be studied will have atrioventricular conduction disturbances that require permanent artificial pacing. In all subjects a biventricular pacemaker will be implanted. Moreover the subjects will be randomized in a biventricular or conventional pacing mode and will be observed for a long term period.

Eligibility

Age

18 - 75 years

Sex

ALL

Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria

•Subjects between the age of 18 to 75 years with classic indication for permanent artificial pacing in which it is expected very high percentage of ventricular pacing, (pacing systoles constitute the 80% and more of the total).
•Physiologic or mildly affected systolic function of left ventricle, LVEF\> 40%.
•Subject is willing and able to comply with the Clinical Investigational Plan and to remain available for follow-up visits, through study closure.
•Subject (or if allowed by local law/regulations: subject's legally authorised representative) is willing and able to sign and date the study Informed Consent.

Exclusion Criteria

•Subjects with classic indication for Biventricular Pacing - (European Guidelines 2007).
•Permanent atrial fibrillation.
•Cardiovascular surgery within the last three months prior to enrollment.
•Myocardial infarction within the last three months prior to enrollment.

Locations (1)

University Hospital of Crete

Heraklion, Crete, Greece

Key Dates

Start Date

November 1, 2007

Primary Completion Date

November 1, 2009

Completion Date

July 1, 2011

Last Updated

June 8, 2011

Enrollment

ESTIMATED participants

Conditions

Atrioventricular Block

Interventions

Biventricular Pacing (DDD(R)- BiV)

OTHER

Trial Evaluating the Benefit of Left Bundle Branch Area Stimulation Compared With Conventional Pacing in Post-TAVI Atrioventricular Atrioventricular Block

NCT07236489

Atrioventricular BlockPacemaker

View study

RECRUITING

POLish Registry of CArdioneuroablation and CArdioneuromodulation

NCT07196397

Vasovagal Syndrome VVSCardioinhibitory Carotid Sinus Syndrome CSS+10 more

View study

Data Source & Attribution

This clinical trial information is sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov, a service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health.

ClinicalTrials.gov last update: June 8, 2011Data synced to Clareo: March 29, 2026

Modifications: This data has been reformatted for display purposes. Eligibility criteria have been parsed into inclusion/exclusion sections. Location data has been geocoded to enable distance-based search. For the authoritative and most current information, please visit ClinicalTrials.gov.

Neither the United States Government nor Clareo Health make any warranties regarding the data. Check ClinicalTrials.gov frequently for updates.

View ClinicalTrials.gov Terms and Conditions

Biventricular Alternative Pacing

Inclusion Criteria

Exclusion Criteria

Trial Evaluating the Benefit of Left Bundle Branch Area Stimulation Compared With Conventional Pacing in Post-TAVI Atrioventricular Atrioventricular Block

POLish Registry of CArdioneuroablation and CArdioneuromodulation

Evaluating the Safety and Effectiveness of 5G Cloud Follow-up for Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices

Left Septal or Deep Septal Pacing to Prevent Pacing-induced Cardiomyopathy

Comparison of Left Bundle Branch Area Versus Right Ventricular Septal Pacing in Patients With High-degree Conduction Disease After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (Left Bundle BRAVE)

BIOTRONIK Conduction System Pacing With the Solia Lead