Saves the questions and what to expect into your notes, next to the visit they belong to.
Keep this study
Lead
DePuy Orthopaedics
The primary objective of this study is to determine whether the passive, non-weight-bearing flexion is superior with the posterior-stabilized PFC® Sigma™ RP-F compared to the posterior-stabilized PFC® Sigma™ RP in bilateral Subjects receiving both implants and if this difference is a function of implant design.
Willing to consent and authorize release of personal health information
Subjects who are able to understand this clinical investigation, co-operate with investigational procedures and are willing to return to the clinic, hospital and predefined physical therapy centers for all the required postoperative follow-ups,
You may not be if
Existing conditions that would compromise participation
Multiple joint involvement
Pregnant/lactating women
Inflammatory arthritis
Fixed flexion contracture greater than 20 degrees
Previous knee replacement of any type
Needing device(s) not specified in protocol
The Subject is a known drug or alcohol abuser or has a psychological disorder that would compromise follow-up
Those who have participated in an investigation in the last 3 months
Those involved in personal injury litigation, medical-legal or workers compensation claims
Failure to follow surgical technique details specified in the protocol
Clareo Health | Does Implant Design Improve Postoperative Flexion?
