Finding studies
Finding studies
Take this into the appointment.
Saves the questions and what to expect into your notes, next to the visit they belong to.
Lead
Gary Morrow
With
OBJECTIVES: * Compare the effectiveness of a 5 hydroxytryptamine 3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonist antiemetic vs prochlorperazine in controlling delayed nausea after chemotherapy in patients with chemotherapy-naive cancer. * Compare the effectiveness of prochlorperazine administered on a preventive vs as needed basis in controlling delayed nausea after chemotherapy in these patients. * Compare the quality of life of patients treated with a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist antiemetic vs prochlorperazine. * Compare the quality of life of patients treated with prochlorperazine administered on a preventive vs as needed basis. OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to center. Patients receive their scheduled chemotherapy regimen containing doxorubicin and their scheduled oral 5 hydroxytryptamine 3 receptor antagonist antiemetic (ondansetron, granisetron, tropisetron, or dolasetron mesylate) combined with dexamethasone on day 1. Patients are then randomized to 1 of 3 antiemetic arms. * Arm I: Patients receive oral prochlorperazine every 8 hours on days 2 and 3. * Arm II: Patients receive oral ondansetron every 12 hours, oral granisetron every 12 hours, or oral dolasetron mesylate either once a day or every 12 hours on days 2 and 3. * Arm III: Patients receive oral prochlorperazine as needed, up to 4 times per day, on days 2 and 3. Quality of life is assessed at baseline and on day 4. PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 670 patients will be accrued for this study within 3 years.
Age
18–120
Sex
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted
