Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
Showing 1-18 of 18 trials
NCT07411768
This prospective, randomized, open-label study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of low-dose colchicine (0.5 mg daily) in reducing transcatheter heart valve (THV) thrombosis in patients after TAVR. Participants will be randomly assigned to either receive colchicine plus standard care or standard care alone for 12 months. The primary goal is to compare the rate of valve thrombosis between the two groups using 4D-CT imaging at one year. Additionally, the study will evaluate the treatment's impact on clinical outcomes and its overall safety profile.
NCT04870424
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a well-established alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement for the treatment of patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. While peri-procedural complications such as stroke, vascular complications and bleeding have substantially declined with the refinement of transcatheter valves and increasing experience, new-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) or atrioventricular conduction disturbances continue to occur in almost half of all patients. Colchicine is a well-known substance that has been approved for the treatment of acute gout flares and familial Mediterranean fever in many countries. Colchicine has proven safe and effective in the prevention of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. The anti-inflammatory effects of colchicine may mitigate the occurrence of atrioventricular conduction disturbances and thus the need for the implantation of a permanent pacemaker post transcatheter aortic valve implantation. The objective of the Co-STAR-Trial is to investigate the efficacy of colchicine for the prevention of new-onset atrial fibrillation and conduction disturbances requiring the implantation of a permanent pacemaker in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Co-STAR is an investigator-initiated, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial. A total of 200 patients referred for treatment of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis and selected to undergo TAVI will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the treatment with Colchicine or placebo for 30 days post transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
NCT05217888
This registry is to evaluate procedural outcomes and safety outcomes of cerebral protection devices during transfemoral TAVR in real-world clinical practice. The data from this registry will be compared with the extracted data from the TP TAVR registry(NCT038262664) using Propensity Score Matching.
NCT05791344
The purpose of this study is to evaluate electrocardiogram (ECG) changes in 100 patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) to assess new-onset conduction abnormalities, such as atrioventricular nodal block (AVB) (1st, 2nd, or 3rd degree), or new-onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) that may occur during the procedure. Eligible patients enrolled in this study will be monitored with an FDA-approved ECG Holter system during TAVR, to assess intra-procedural changes. This will be a small-scale, early feasibility study performed to inform a future, larger-scale prospective investigation.
NCT06518317
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if reducing the duration of treatment by aspirin to 3 months (short treatment regimen) after percutaneous aortic valve replacement is as safe and efficient as the routine lifetime treatment by aspirin (standard treatment regimen). The main questions it aims to answer are: Does the reduction of the duration of aspirin reduces rates of bleeding without increasing the risk of cardiovascular events. Researchers will compare a short treatment by aspirin (3 months) to a long treatment by aspirin (12 months) after percutaneous replacement of the aortic valve. Participants will: Take aspirin for 3 months in one group or 12 months in another group Be contacted by phone or visit the clinic at 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 months after hospital discharge Keep a diary of any bleeding or cardiovascular events occurring during the study period
NCT04982406
This is a prospective observational study, the purpose of which is to: 1. Characterize response of the AV conduction system to TAVR with various prostheses by recording continuous His bundle electrograms during valve placement. 2. Correlate preprocedure ECG features with changes in AV nodal and infranodal conduction during placement of the valve prosthesis. 3. Correlate changes in AV nodal and infranodal conduction during the procedure with risk of developing AV conduction block after TAVR. 4. Assess the contribution of stressing the conduction system by atrial pacing prior to and following TAVR to prediction of postprocedural heart block. Assess the correlation between new onset bundle branch block, site and degree of conduction block or delay and subsequent development of high-grade or complete AV block.
NCT04139616
The high incidence and variety of conduction disturbances post-TAVR represents a major challenge in the periprocedural management of TAVR recipients. Despite the growing body of knowledge on this topic, the large variability in the management of these complications has translated into a high degree of uncertainty regarding the most appropriate treatment of a large proportion of such patients. The implementation of a pre-specified treatment strategy translating into a more uniform practice regarding the management of conduction disturbances post-TAVR applied to a large cohort of patients would permit to identify the benefits and drawbacks of each specific aspect of the treatment algorithm proposal. This may also help to improve both the management and clinical outcomes of the complex group of patients with conduction disturbances associated with TAVR. In the end, the final objective of a pre-specified strategy for managing conduction disturbances post-TAVR should be to obtain a low rate of PPM without increasing the risk of sudden death or life threatening arrhythmic events following hospital discharge, and all this while avoiding an excessive prolongation of the hospitalization period following the TAVR procedure.
NCT05750927
To describe the prevalence and clinical features of patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI and concomitant clinically indicated, complex and/or high-risk PCI
NCT05375474
This is a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled study meant to test the superior efficacy of oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy versus single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) in patients after TAVR. Patients who accept successful TAVR will be randomized to receive either the OAC group (Vitamin-K antagonists) or the SAPT group (aspirin) for 6 months on a 1:1 ratio. After that, patients from both groups will be treated with single antiplatelet therapy (aspirin). All patients will be followed for 1 year to test the difference between net clinical benefits and bioprosthetic valve thrombosis diagnosed by 4D-CT.
NCT03747432
Aortic valve stenosis is the most common valvular heart disease in the developed world, affecting 3,9% of population over 70 years of age. If untreated it carries a poor prognosis, leading to heart failure and death in 2 years after first symptom presentation. Treatment of choice for severe aortic stenosis is surgical aortic valve replacement. A new treatment option for severe aortic stenosis emerged in the last decade - Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR). This minimally invasive method was formerly reserved for high risk patients deemed unfit for surgical aortic valve replacement. Increasing use throughout the developed world and recent studies have established TAVR as a safe and viable treatment option also for intermediate-risk patients. TAVR not only enables a less aggressive surgical approach, but also a less invasive type of anaesthesia. Anaesthesiologists are trying to modify the type of anaesthesia in the way of minimally invasive approach, aiming to improve the overall outcome. TAVR can be performed under general anaesthesia or procedural sedation (PS). From the start, TAVR was performed solely under general anaesthesia. Over time the procedure became routine and the anaesthesiologists started to commonly decide for PS. Many US and European retrospective studies have established PS to be a safe and compelling method of anaesthetic care for TAVR procedures with a favorable perioperative course, less complications, shorter intensive care unit and in-hospital stay and lower early mortality, when performed by an experienced anaesthesia team. There are many anaesthesia agents currently accepted for PS in everyday anaesthesia practice. Presently, reliable data from studies comparing different agents for PS for TAVR procedures is scarce. Most of it comes from retrospective nonrandomized trials. Propofol is a popular anaesthetic agent for PS. According to current studies, it is a safe anaesthetic agent with favorable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles with quite low incidence of side effects. In recent years, dexmedetomidine has been commonly used for PS having analgesic properties inclusive of its anaesthetic properties. In addition, dexmedetomidine is associated with a lesser degree of respiratory depression as to other anaesthetic agents. Patient comfort is also believed to be improved with dexmedetomidine. Studies comparing outcomes of PS with propofol versus dexmedetomidine for different non-cardiac and interventional procedures showed benefits of dexmedetomidine, owing to its analgesic properties and preferable respiratory parameters. The aim of this study is to compare the outcome of patients undergoing TAVR under PS with dexmedetomidine against those undergoing TAVR under PS with propofol. With the results the investigators aim to aid in defining the optimal anaesthetic agent for PS for TAVR and possibly other interventional cardiology procedures.
NCT04659538
This is a First in Human study with the Filerlex CAPTIS device designed to demonstrate the safety and feasibility of the device in subjects undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR)
NCT05283356
The optimal pharmacological therapy after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) to prevent valve thrombosis and reduce thromboembolic complications without significantly increasing the risk of bleeding is not yet fully defined and constitutes an important unmet clinical need. Recently, single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) with Aspirin has been increasingly adopted to avoid bleeding early after TAVI compared with dual antiplatelet therapy. However, TAVI population is affected by a diversity of chronic pathologies that increase the risk of post-TAVI ischemic complications. Stroke is prevalent, especially peri- and early post-TAVI (\<1-8% in the 1st year). Although peri-TAVI myocardial infarction (MI) is rare (1-3%), concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD), diabetes mellitus (DM), and peripheral vascular disease (PVD), is very frequent in the TAVI population, affecting around 30-70% of patients. In patients with CAD, the need to re-access the coronary arteries after TAVI is challenging and can be hampered by the trancatheter valve struts. This is critical in TAVI patients with an acute coronary syndrome and in younger patients with long-life expectancy after TAVI. The use of a P2Y12 inhibitor provides significant ischemic protection in the in the coronary, cerebral and peripheral vascular territories compare to Aspirin. The use of a P2Y12 inhibitor as antiplatelet treatment can decrease the need for new coronary revascularizations and reduce the incidence of thromboembolic complications after TAVI.
NCT05202977
This study was designed to preliminary verify the safety and of efficacy of SinocrownTM Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement System With accessories in patients with symptomatic, calcified and severe aortic stenosis using objective performance criteria
NCT05024942
1. Introduction and aims: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is the gold standard for the treatment of elderly patients with severe aortic valve stenosis (AS). AS causes left ventricular remodeling as well as left atrial enlargement, pulmonary artery and right ventricular changes, these changes, and whether they are reversible (reverse remodeling) are major determinants of outcome after TAVR. Heart Failure (HF) is the most frequent cause of cardiac re-hospitalization after TAVR. Most HF exacerbations are related to a progressive rise in cardiac filling pressures that precipitates pulmonary congestion and symptomatic decompensation. Traditionally, pulmonary congestion has been assessed by physical examination and chest radiography but clinical signs and symptoms of congestion are poor surrogates for ventricular filling pressures and are not reliable predictors of imminent hospitalization. Recently, lung ultrasonography (LUS) has been identified as a sensitive and semi-quantitative tool for the assessment of pulmonary congestion in HF. The technique is based on the detection of vertical echogenic artifacts arising from the pleural line, named "B-lines". The number of B-lines is associated with increased risk of adverse events during hospitalization and after hospital discharge. CLUSTER-HF Trial demonstrated that the routine incorporation of LUS during clinical follow-up of patients with recent acute decompensated HF without a surgically correctable cause, was associated with a risk reduction of adverse HF events, mainly urgent HF visits. Thus, LUS could represent a promising tool to detect pulmonary congestion related to AS. To date, there are no studies on the role of LUS in the context of AS and TAVR. The study hypothesis is that in patients with higher number of B-lines before-TAVR and after TAVR, the rate of adverse events during follow-up is higher. 2. Study design: This is a single center prospective study carried out at Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli IRCCS, Roma and involving patients with severe aortic stenosis submitted to TAVR treatment. The expected recruitment period is approximately one year For patients fulfilling inclusion/exclusion criteria, all data about clinical status leading to TAVR, exams and any specific documentation during hospitalization will be collected. 3. Number of patients: For the primary end-point, a sample-size of 91 is computed using the one-sample chi-square test and assuming a proportion of LUS-evaluated pulmonary congested patients before TAVR of 50% and a proportion of 35% of LUS-evaluated pulmonary congested patients after TAVR. To accommodate for possible missing investigations, sample size will be increased to 105 patients. The secondary end-point is the association between pre-TAVR and post-TAVR B-lines and long-term outcomes. Based on previous studies, the investigators know that the incidence of rehospitalization for heart failure during one-year after TAVR is 14% and that patients suffering from heart failure without LUS-evaluated pulmonary congestion are at very low risk of heart failure rehospitalization during follow-up. So, for sample size calculation of the secondary endpoint, the investigators estimated a cumulative incidence higher in the LUS- evaluated pulmonary congestion group with more than 16 B-lines on all scanning sites (30% of events during 1-year of follow-up) with a lower incidence of 8% in the remaining patients. With an HR of 5 favoring patients wit less than 15 B-Lines on all scanning, and aiming to a 2-sided alpha level of 0.05 and a power of 80% the investigators estimated 144 patients. To accommodate for possible missing investigations, sample size will be increased to 150 patients. 4. In-hospital study schedule: For each patient, the investigators will obtain from our general hospital database the following clinical data: * Demographic and clinical data documentation; * Clinical examination: before TAVR, before discharge and when adverse events occur; * Blood analysis; * TAVR procedural characteristics and complications. 5. Instrumental diagnostic exams (Echocardiography and lung ultrasound): Each patient will be evaluated before and after TAVR with a comprehensive echocardiogram and LUS for the evaluation of the pulmonary congestion. All the evaluations will be performed the day before TAVR and after TAVR. In consideration of the operator's dependence on ultrasound methods to reduce the error rate, all examinations will be performed by qualified personnel. 6. Clinical follow up assessment: Clinical follow up information will be obtained from: visits, review of the patient's hospital record, personal communication with the patient's physician and review of the patient's chart, a telephone interview with the patient conducted by trained medical personnel The following information will be recorded: clinical status assessment, adverse event assessment, record cardiac medications.
NCT02664649
ATLANTIS is a multicenter, phase IIIb, prospective, open-label, randomized trial. The objective of this study is to demonstrate superiority of a strategy of anticoagulation with apixaban (Anti-Xa Group) as compared to the current standard of care in patients who have undergone a successful TAVI procedure. The randomization is stratified according to the presence or not of a mandatory indication for anticoagulation for a reason other than the TAVI procedure (e.g. atrial fibrillation or DVT/PE).
NCT01627691
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and performance of the Lotus™ Valve System for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in symptomatic subjects with severe calcific aortic stenosis who are considered high risk for surgical valve replacement.
NCT02255851
The SENTINEL Post-Market Registry is a prospective, multi-center, registry using the CE-Marked Sentinel System in subjects with severe symptomatic calcified native aortic valve stenosis indicated for TAVR. Subjects enrolled in the registry will undergo TAVR + Sentinel. Basic demographic information and detailed procedural data will be captured and documented in a registry case report form. All Sentinel filters will be sent for histopathology at an independent core-lab.
NCT02659137
TAVI induced LBBB is a complication that occurs between 7 and 65 % of the cases, numbers that differ considerably between devices. There is an increased risk of progression to total AV-block at follow-up, with the risk of brady-arrhythmic death. The aim of the study is to elucidate the anatomical location of the conduction pathology of a TAVI induced LBBB. This could impact valve design and placement and thereby reduce the number of new LBBB induced by TAVI in the future. Furthermore, finding predictors for progression to a high degree AV block in the follow-up (and thus an indication for permanent pacemaker) could improve management of post-operative conduction abnormalities and prevent the risk of brady-arrhythmic death.