Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
Showing 1-9 of 9 trials
NCT04502966
The primary objective of this study is to assess whether the combination of grass allergen sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) and dupilumab for 2 years is more effective than double placebo in suppressing the nasal allergen challenge (NAC) response to grass pollen at 1 year after completion of study medication.
NCT05560698
The motivation-enhancing intervention is designed for participants in the ILIT.NU trial. The participants are patients with hay fever who are treated with a vaccination in an inguinal lymph node. The motivation-enhancing intervention is a web-based app developed in collaboration with patient partners and is intended to increase retention and reporting in the ILIT.NU trial.
NCT03727399
The project examines the hypothesis that monoclonal allergen-neutralizing antibodies can be recombinantly produced from B lymphocytes isolated from pollen allergic patients. Patient samples suitable for antibody cloning are selected based on seroprofiling for the respective allergens. The study aims at isolating lymphocytes from patients with potential allergen-neutralizing IgG in serum and to clone antibodies from antibody gene sequences obtained from B cells of those patients.
NCT04622917
This study evaluates the effect of intramuscular injected methylprednisolone treating birch pollen induced rhinitis compared to placebo.
NCT04874714
Prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter of 3 active treatment groups, compared to 1 placebo group, for the determination of the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous immunotherapy in patients with mild to moderate asthma and allergic rhinitis/rhinoconjunctivitis (intermittent or persistent) due to hypersensitivity to house dust mites (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and / or D. farinae) and grass pollen
NCT01449786
More than 70% of birch pollen allergic patients suffer from allergic reactions to certain foods, e.g. stone fruits, hazelnut and some vegetables. However, specific immunotherapy (SIT) with birch pollen extract is not effective for the treatment of associated food allergy in a substantial number of patients. Based on our previous clinical and immunological investigations of birch pollen related food allergy (BPRFA) the investigators hypothesize that for effective SIT of this abundant food allergy the disease-eliciting food allergens should be employed. To prove this concept, the investigators aim to sublingually administer the major apple allergen, Mal d 1, to birch pollen-allergic patients with concomitant apple allergy and evaluate clinical and immunological effects of this treatment. The investigators choose Mal d 1 as model food allergen because (i) its cross-reactivity with Bet v 1 has been well characterized,(ii) apple is the most frequent trigger for BPRFA and (iii) recombinant(r)Mal d 1 was well tolerated after sublingual administration to 20 birch pollen-allergic patients in a previous study. Sublingual administration of a defined concentration of GMP-rMal d 1 will be compared with equal doses of GMP-rBet v 1 as a positive control and placebo-treatment. Clinical parameters will include skin prick tests (SPT) and objective and subjective assessment of apple and birch pollen-induced allergic symptoms. Immunological parameters will comprise the analysis of antibody and T cell responses to Mal d 1 and Bet v 1 as well as the evaluation of basophil activation. The proposed pilot study will be a first investigation of the concept to specifically treat BPRFA with the involved food allergens and thus, represents an important step in the development of an efficient and safe therapy in the future.
NCT01538979
The study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of BM32 in grass pollen allergic subjects. It will test the hypothesis that either of two doses of BM32 will lead to a sustained relief off allergy symptoms over a two year study period.
NCT01830673
The primary endpoint was the induction of T-regulatory cells under s specific subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT). Patients suffering from grass pollen allergy (relevant clinical symptomes during the pollen season, Skin Prick test diamter \>4mm or RAST class II or higher) were included. The patients were allocated to three study groups: Group 1: during and directly after SCIT (after completion the 2nd or 3rd year of treatment) Group 2: completed SCIT more then three years ago Group 3: Patients with clinically relevant grass pollen allergy without SCIT. The investigators analyzed the lung function parameters, exhaled NO (eNO) and asked the patients to record symptoms during the adjacent pollen season. A blood sample was drawn to analyze the amount of TH1 and TH2 and regulatory T-cells, inflammatory markers(IL-2, IL-5, IL-10, IL-12/23, TNF-alpha, IFN-gamma) and blocking antibodies (IgG, IgG4).
NCT01308021
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of grass pollen-derived peptides administrated orally to treat seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis.