Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
Browse 1,019 clinical trials for pancreatic cancer. Find studies that match your criteria and connect with research centers.
Find trials near:
Showing 541-560 of 1,019 trials
NCT04892329
Pancreatic cancer is one of the most lethal cancers. Survival rates vary largely depending on the stage at which it is diagnosed. EUS is considered one of the most sensitive modalities for pancreatic cancer detection. To avoid a missed diagnosis of the pancreatic cancer, the continuity and integrity of EUS needs to be ensured as much as possible. The station approach in pancreatic EUS has been established as the standard scanning procedure. Complete anatomical scanning is helpful for the identification of standard stations, and its imaging findings can assist in the diagnosis of pancreatic lesions and guide patient treatment and prognosis. But EUS is highly operator-dependent and the learning curve is steep. In this study, we constructed a deep learning-based pancreatic scanning navigation system in EUS, which can assist in identifying important anatomical structures adjacent to the pancreas in real time. In order to improve the quality of EUS and reduce the missed diagnosis of pancreatic lesions.
NCT05436704
Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) with tissue acquisition (TA) is nowadays a well-established technique for the sampling of solid lesions pancreatic and non-pancreatic lesions. Major complications after EUS-TA of solid masses are rare. Several studies have been published in the last recent years aimed to identify factors related to a non-diagnostic or false-negative EUS-FNA, and to improve its diagnostic yield using different needle gauge and different tissue acquisition technique as fanning technique, slow-pull stylet extraction or suction technique. To overcome this problem, new EUS-TA needles entered in clinical practice to obtain histological specimens increasing the accuracy of the EUS-TA. Preliminary result with these new needles, called EUS-fine needle biopsy (FNB) are promising with an accuracy rate more than 90%. Recently, Leungh et al. conducted an observational study to evaluate the role of macroscopic on-site evaluation (MOSE) on the diagnostic accuracy of 22G Franseen-tip needle. The study demonstrated that MOSE using the 22G Franseen tip needle could limit needle passes by accurately estimating histologic core fragments. However, the study limitations such as the small sample size and the lack of control group, hampered the value of the conclusions. So, nowadays, no definitive data regarding how many needle passes need to be performed with FNB needles, neither regarding the use of MOSE to evaluate the specimens obtained with FNB needle. The MOSE technique of the acquired tissue was proposed for the first time by Iwashita et al, using a 19G needle and is nowadays a well-established technique with high accuracy in the final diagnosis. The aim of our study is to evaluate if during EUS-FNB of pancreatic masses only one needle pass with MOSE evaluation can be satisfactory to obtain a correct diagnosis.