Psychophysiological Effects of Green Exercise in Outdoor Green vs. Indoor Control

Core Purpose: Researchers want to learn if walking in an outdoor green environment helps people recover from mental tiredness and stress better than walking indoors. This study investigates how a 30-minute walk in an outdoor green setting affects the mind and body compared to a 30-minute walk on a treadmill in a room without windows. The Study Process: The study included 80 healthy young adults between the ages of 18 and 35. Researchers randomly split the participants into two groups. 1. The Outdoor Green group: Participants walked for 30 minutes on a path in an outdoor green environment. 2. The Indoor Control group: This group walked for 30 minutes on a treadmill in a windowless room. What is Being Measured: To understand how the environment helps the brain recover, researchers used a "Sensory-to-Appraisal" model to measure several factors. 1. Information Harvesting: Researchers used a new tool called the Nature Sensory Sensitivity Index (NSSI). This measures how well participants notice and "capture" sensory details from their surroundings, like the sounds of birds or the textures of plants. 2. Restorative Feelings: Using the Perceived Restorativeness Scale (PRS), participants reported if they felt the environment helped them "get away" from daily stress and if the setting was interesting or beautiful. 3. Overall Mood Changes (POMS TMD): Researchers used the Profile of Mood States (POMS) to calculate a Total Mood Disturbance (TMD) score. This helps show if participants feel less tense, angry, or tired, and more energetic after the walk. 4. Connection to Nature (NR): Researchers measured each participant's Nature Relatedness (NR). This describes how much a person naturally feels connected to the natural world, which may influence how much they benefit from the green walk. 5. Attention and Thinking: Participants performed a "Digit Span Task" (repeating sequences of numbers) to test if their focus improved. 6. Physical Stress: The study used objective markers, including salivary cortisol (a stress hormone) and heart rate variability (a measure of how the nervous system relaxes). Why This Matters: The goal of this research is to see if actively noticing an outdoor green environment (sensory harvesting) is the "key" that unlocks mental recovery. By comparing the Outdoor Green group with the Indoor Control group, this study helps us understand why nature is good for public health and how to design better spaces for stress relief.

Study Overview and Theoretical Framework This randomized controlled trial (RCT) aims to investigate the psychophysiological restorative effects of green exercise. The study is grounded in Attention Restoration Theory (ART) and Stress Recovery Theory (SRT). It specifically tests a "Sensory-to-Appraisal" model, which proposes that the restorative benefits of nature are driven by an initial stage of objective sensory information harvesting, followed by subjective restorative appraisal. Experimental Design A total of 80 healthy young adults (aged 18-35) were recruited and randomly assigned to one of two groups with a 1:1 allocation ratio. 1. The Outdoor Green group: Participants performed a standardized 30-minute walk along a pre-defined route in a forest park environment. 2. The Indoor Control group: Participants performed a 30-minute walk on a treadmill in a controlled laboratory setting (windowless room, neutral environment) at a self-selected moderate pace to match the physical intensity of the outdoor group. Experimental Procedure The experiment followed a five-stage longitudinal design. 1. Baseline (T0): Collection of demographic data, Nature Relatedness (NR) scales, and initial physiological/psychological measurements. 2. Stress Induction: Participants underwent a cognitive stressor to induce mental fatigue and psychological stress. 3. Intervention (T1): The 30-minute walking intervention in the assigned environment. 4. Post-Intervention (T2): Immediate post-test measurements including sensory harvesting (NSSI), perceived restorativeness (PRS), and emotional states. 5. Recovery Monitoring: Follow-up assessment of cognitive function and physiological recovery markers. Key Measures 1. Sensory Harvesting: Measured by the Nature Sensory Sensitivity Index (NSSI), a tool designed to quantify the objective capture of environmental stimuli. 2. Psychological Appraisal: Evaluated via the Perceived Restorativeness Scale (PRS). 3. Cognitive Function: Assessed through the Digit Span Task (Forward and Backward) to measure working memory and directed attention. 4. Affective States: Measured using the Profile of Mood States (POMS) to calculate Total Mood Disturbance (TMD) and self-esteem scales. 5. Physiological Response: Objective stress recovery was monitored via salivary cortisol levels and Heart Rate Variability (HRV), specifically the RMSSD (Root Mean Square of Successive Differences) to assess parasympathetic activation. Statistical Analysis The study uses a serial mediation model to analyze how the environment intervention influences restorative outcomes through the sequential mediation of NSSI and PRS. Mixed-model ANOVAs are used to compare between-group differences across time points.