A Study to Compare How Much of the Study Treatment Finerenone Gets Into the Blood When the Same Amount is Taken in One and in Two Tablets of Different Strengths in Healthy Male Participants

In this bioequivalence study, healthy male participants took the study treatment finerenone in the form of one and two tablets of different strengths by mouth. "Bioequivalence" means that the researchers want to show similar blood levels of finerenone in the participants when they take the one tablet form of finerenone compared to the two tablets form. This study helped researchers learn more about a new finerenone tablet with higher strength, which is being developed to treat people who have heart failure (HF) with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 40%. HF with LVEF ≥ 40% is a condition which occurs when the left side of the heart does not pump blood out to the body as well as it should. Over time, the body does not get the amount of oxygen it needs. This can lead to shortness of breath and tiredness, making it harder for people to do their daily tasks. Finerenone works by blocking a certain protein, called mineralocorticoid receptor. By doing this, finerenone reduces damage to kidneys, heart and blood vessels. It is available and approved for doctors to prescribe to people with chronic kidney disease together with type 2 diabetes. The main objective of this study was to compare how much finerenone gets into the blood when the participants took the same amount of finerenone in the form of one and two tablets of different strengths by mouth. Another objective of this study was to learn the degree to which medical problems that might be caused by finerenone can be tolerated (also called "tolerability") by the participants. These medical problems were also known as "adverse events". Doctors kept track of all adverse events that happened in the study, even if they did not think they might be related to the study treatments. The study was conducted in a single-center, randomized, non-blinded, two-way crossover design in healthy male participants aged 18 to 55 years. "Single-center" means at one research center or one hospital. "Randomized" means that the study participants were randomly (by chance) assigned to one of two sequences of treatments. "Non-blinded" means that both the participants and the study doctors and their team know what the participants will take. In a "two-way crossover" study, all the participants take all of the treatments, but in a different order. Each participant was in the study for approximately 4-6 weeks including a stay in the center for up to 6 days with 5 overnight stays. In this study, each participant took finerenone twice by mouth on an empty stomach. They took finerenone in the form of one and two tablets of different strengths. The tablet form that was taken first depended on the treatment sequence to which the participants were assigned. There was a period of 3 days between the intake of the tablets. Each participant served as his/her own control. This means that researchers made comparisons between the two tablet forms of finerenone within the same participant. During the study, the doctors and their study team took blood and urine samples, did physical examinations, performed ECG and checked vital signs such as blood pressure, heart rate and body temperature. Participants of this study were healthy and had no benefit from taking the study treatment finerenone. However, the study provided information on how to use the new tablet form of finerenone to treat patients with HF with LVEF ≥ 40% Specific measures had been put in place to counter and minimize the risks related to the conduct of this study. Information on safety of finerenone was already available from previous studies. Monitoring procedures, limitation of given doses and exclusion criteria had been defined. Blood samples were taken via an indwelling catheter (up to 15 times on the treatment days and once the day after). One screening visit was planned up to 28 days before the start of treatment and one visit was planned about 7 days after the end of treatment. The benefit-risk assessment was considered positive and justified the conduct of the planned study in healthy participants.