TAP vs QL Block for DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction

The purpose of this two-arm clinical study is to compare two nerve block techniques, the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block and the quadratus lumborum (QL) block, in terms of how well they manage pain in the immediate postoperative period in patients undergoing deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction.

This study is a randomized trial with two parallel intervention arms comparing TAP and QL blocks for post-operative analgesia in patients undergoing deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction. Participants scheduled to undergo DIEP flap breast reconstruction will be prospectively recruited and randomly allocated to receive either a surgeon-placed TAP block intraoperatively or an anesthesiologist-placed, ultrasound-guided QL block preoperatively. The overall objective of this study is to provide evidence of a best-practice procedure for managing pain post-operatively. Aim 1: To compare postoperative pain scores and total opioid consumption (in morphine milligram equivalents) in the first 48 hours postoperatively between the two study groups. Hypothesis 1: Receipt of the QL block is associated with relatively lower postoperative pain scores and reduced total opioid consumption. Aim 2: To describe any changes in operation duration, time spent in the PACU, length of stay, time to ambulation, and costs that may be associated with using the more efficacious nerve block (as determined by results related to the primary objective). Hypothesis 2: The QL block will be associated with shorter time to ambulation, time spent in the PACU, and length of stay. Because of requirements for the QL block to be administered preoperatively solely under ultrasound guidance by an anesthesiologist, receipt of the QL block is associated with increased operation time and total procedural costs compared to receipt of the TAP block.