Impact of Whole Body Vibration on Muscle Function and Respiratory Parameters in Intensive Care Patients

Immobility and mechanical ventilation in intensive care unit (ICU) patients lead to muscle weakness and loss, particularly in antigravity and respiratory muscles. Early physiotherapy interventions are crucial to prevent complications, reduce side effects, shorten intubation time, and lower patient costs. ICU physiotherapy includes chest physiotherapy, range of motion exercises, strengthening exercises, mobilization, positioning, and inspiratory/peripheral muscle training. Muscle training plays a key role in ICU physiotherapy. Whole Body Vibration (WBV) is a promising, side-effect-free intervention to enhance muscle strength in various populations. Its effects result from neuromuscular responses to mechanical vibrations and the tonic vibration reflex. WBV has been reported to improve muscle strength, elasticity, circulation, and balance while reducing pain and fall risk. However, its effects on ICU patients remain unclear. To date, only one study has shown increased muscle electrical activity in ICU patients after WBV, but no research has evaluated changes in muscle strength, mass, or elasticity. Another method used in muscle training is neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES), which prevents muscle atrophy, strengthens muscles, and restores endurance. NMES is suitable for patients with limited cooperation, making it an alternative to active exercise. No study has compared NMES and WBV in immobile ICU patients. Given the limited non-pharmacological options in ICU care, particularly for unconscious or uncooperative patients, identifying effective alternatives is essential. This study aims to compare the effects of WBV and NMES on respiratory muscle strength, respiratory parameters, and muscle mass, composition, elasticity, and strength in ICU patients. Participants will be divided into three groups: WBV (n=15), NMES (n=15), and conventional therapy only (n=15). All groups will receive conventional therapy five days a week for four weeks, with WBV added to the first group and NMES to the second. Functional status, muscle assessments, grip strength, respiratory muscle strength, and respiratory parameters will be evaluated at baseline and study completion. The findings will provide objective data on the effectiveness of WBV and NMES in ICU patients, guiding future research and treatment while contributing to national and international literature.

This randomized controlled trial will investigate and compare the effects of WBV and NMES on respiratory muscle strength, respiratory parameters, and muscle mass, composition, elasticity, and strength in ICU patients. A total of 45 patients will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: WBV Group (n=15): Conventional therapy + Whole Body Vibration NMES Group (n=15): Conventional therapy + Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Control Group (n=15): Conventional therapy only