Comprehensive Management of Rectal Cancer

study on the strategy we have adopted for rectal cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy in the case of a complete reponse ( surveillance vs. surgery) Particular Case of Patients with Complete Response After CRT. Traditionally, for patients with mid or lower rectal cancer, a protocol involving chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery 8 to 10 weeks after the end of radiotherapy and chemotherapy is systematically indicated after a post-chemoradiotherapy reassessment using pelvic MRI. In a certain number of patients (25%), it was noted that the reevaluation through pelvic MRI after chemoradiotherapy shows complete tumor disappearance. However, these patients were still operated on according to the standard procedure, and pathologists found no tumor in the surgical specimen (sterile specimen). These are patients with a complete radiological and pathological response. In such cases, it is possible to resect the scar that remains at the site of the tumor (radiotherapy sequelae) and closely monitor the patient to detect recurrence in the short and medium term, thus avoiding mutilating surgery that impacts quality of life (fecal and gas incontinence, increased bowel movements, urinary and gynecological sexual disorders). This is known as the "Watch and Wait" strategy. "Watch and Wait" Strategy. An initial opportunistic approach, also called Watch and Wait (W\&W), involves monitoring patients who are considered to have a complete response after CRT or total neoadjuvant treatment, regardless of the initial stage. This approach was developed by Habr-Gama et al. in Brazil and published in 18 different articles, involving a cohort of 361 patients, with complete response rates ranging from 20% to 30%. Local recurrence rates varied from 5% to 25% depending on the articles and the timing of complete clinical response evaluation, while maintaining a 5-year disease-free survival rate of 52% and an overall survival rate of 85%. These series primarily included cT2 or cT3 tumors, but also cT4 tumors. Complete clinical response was defined as the absence of any clinical tumor residue (no tumor, no ulcer, and negative biopsy), and patients were monitored monthly. However, the evaluation timeline for complete response varied across the articles, ranging from 8 weeks to 14 months. At present, no official recommendations validate this strategy; it remains an expert opinion. The aim is to demonstrate that we could avoid surgery in patients with a complete response (we have favored rectal surgery for the majority of our patients due to organizational obstacles, patient-related issues, and the difficulty in applying rigorous surveillance in certain cases). The purpose of this research is to improve our practices in managing rectal cancer in patients with a complete response.