Immersive v/s Non-immersive Virtual Reality in Enhancing Upper Limb Functions Among Individuals With Subacute Stage Hemiplegia

The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the effectiveness of immersive virtual reality combined with conventional therapy to the effectiveness of non-immersive virtual reality combined with conventional therapy in enhancing upper limb function in subacute hemiplegic stroke patients.

The study is a single blinded randomized controlled trial in which the assessor will be blinded. Male and female participants aged between 28-55 years are included in the study. Participants are selected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria and are later randomly assigned to Group 1 and Group 2. Group 1 - Conventional therapy and Immersive Virtual Reality Group 2 - Conventional therapy and Non-Immersive Virtual Reality Primary Outcome measures include the Fugl Meyer Assessment for Upper limb and Graded Wolf Motor Function test for upper limb. Secondary Outcome measure is the Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QOL) Questionnaire. Therapy session starts with 15 minutes of stretching and strengthening exercises of the affected arm followed by 45 minutes of Immersive / Non Immersive virtual reality training. Follow up assessment is done 6 weeks post intervention. The baseline assessment score and follow up assessment scores will be compared.