PIEB Compared With CEI on Breakthrough Pain in Nulliparous Women

The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to examine the impact of programmed intermittent bolus epidural analgesia technique on the incidence of breakthrough pain during labor in nulliparous women compared to continuous epidural infusion. Nulliparous women will randomly be divided during labor into two groups; study group will receive mix of Bupivacaine and fentanyl once (bolus) every 60 minutes; the control group will receive continuously the same dose during an hour, until delivery.

There are several pharmacological and non-pharmacological techniques for pain relief during labor. Epidural analgesia is considered the most effective modality for intrapartum pain relief. Maintenance of epidural analgesia is achieved by different techniques; continuous epidural infusion (CEI), intermittent epidural analgesia (IEA), patient control epidural analgesia (PCEA) and combination between the techniques. Another technique, the Programmed Intermittent Bolus Epidural Analgesia (PIBEA). The advantage of this technique is that boluses are given all the time at planned intervals, so laboring women do not depend on the medical staff to receive the bolus when there is a breakthrough pain. This method has been reported to be associated with less motor block, lower incidence of instrumental vaginal deliveries, and less consumption of anesthetic agents when compared to CEI. There are no conclusive data regarding the use of PIBEA in combination with PCEA compared to CEI and PCEA on the effect of pain relief during labor and birth outcomes. The hypothesis of the current trial is that PIBEA and PCEA will decrease the incidence of breakthrough pain, and probably shorten the second stage of labor, lead to fewer instrumental deliveries and higher women's satisfaction compared to CEI and PCEA.