Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement For Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Stenosis (Type 0) Using Down Sizing Strategy Compared With Standard Sizing Strategy (HANGZHOU Solution): A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial
To compare down sizing strategy versus annular sizing strategy technique (control group) in Type 0 bicuspid aortic stenosis (AS) patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with self-expanding valves (SEVs): a randomized superiority trial
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has emerged as a favorable alternative for severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) patients of all surgical risk profiles. Patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) underwent TAVR had similar 30-day mortality as well as stroke and new pacemaker implantation rates compared to tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) subjects, but carried higher risk of moderate/severe perivalvular leakage (PVL), conversion to surgery and device failure. Clinical experience in China suggests BAV and heavy calcium burden are more common among TAVR candidates than US/EU cohorts. Morphological characteristics at supra-annular structure (from annulus to the level of sinotubular junction) are quite complex in BAV, especially concomitant with heavily calcified leaflets. From our previous single center clinical practice, "waist sign" above the annulus during balloon aortic valvuloplasty in TAVR was often observed in patients with bicuspid AS, suggesting that supra-annular structures are the most constrained portion of BAV anatomy where the prosthesis anchors and seals. Therefore, we developed a balloon based supra-annular sizing strategy for self-expanding valves implantation in BAV and the device failure rate as well as pacemaker implantation rates were relatively low as shown in previous cohort study. Several other studies have also achieved successful outcomes associated with device "down sizing" (using a device smaller than that recommended by annular sizing). The aim of this study is to compare "down sizing"strategy (experimental group) versus annular sizing strategy (control group) in BAV patients undergoing TAVR with self-expanding valves.
Age
60 - No limit years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No
Fujian Provincial Hospital, Affiliated to Fuzhou University
Fuzhou, Fujian, China
Xiamen Cardiovascular Hospital Xiamen University
Xiamen, Fujian, China
Lanzhou University First Hospital
Lanzhou, Gansu, China
Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
SUN YAT-SEN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL SUN YAT-SEN University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Yulin First People's Hospital
Yulin, Guangxi, China
Zhengzhou Seventh People's Hospital
Zhengzhou, Henan, China
The Second XIANGYA Hospital Of Central South University
Changsha, Hunan, China
The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University
Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
First Affiliated Hospital of Xi 'an Jiaotong University
Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
Start Date
June 27, 2022
Primary Completion Date
July 30, 2026
Completion Date
June 30, 2030
Last Updated
October 3, 2025
206
ESTIMATED participants
TAVR for BAV Using Down Sizing with the Evolut Pro platform
PROCEDURE
TAVR for BAV Using Traditional Sizing strategy with the Evolut Pro platform
PROCEDURE
Lead Sponsor
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
Data Source & Attribution
This clinical trial information is sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov, a service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health.
Modifications: This data has been reformatted for display purposes. Eligibility criteria have been parsed into inclusion/exclusion sections. Location data has been geocoded to enable distance-based search. For the authoritative and most current information, please visit ClinicalTrials.gov.
Neither the United States Government nor Clareo Health make any warranties regarding the data. Check ClinicalTrials.gov frequently for updates.
View ClinicalTrials.gov Terms and Conditions