Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
Comparative Study Between Dural Puncture Epidural Technique Versus Conventional Epidural Technique During Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
This study will be conducted on 50 patients of ASA grade I and II aged from 25 to 55 years and presented for laparoscopic hysterectomy. Patients will be divided into two equal groups; group A control group for conventional epidural technique(n=25) and group B for 25G dural puncture epidural with 25G pencil point Whitacre spinal needle (n=25). Randomization will be done using computer generated number and concealed using sequentially numbered, sealed opaque envelope.
Age
25 - 55 years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Department of Anesthesia, Surgical ICU, and Pain Management
Cairo, Egypt
Start Date
August 18, 2021
Primary Completion Date
November 2, 2022
Completion Date
December 10, 2022
Last Updated
December 15, 2022
50
ACTUAL participants
Conventional Epidural Technique
PROCEDURE
Dural Puncture Epidural Technique using pencil-point 25G Whitacre needle
PROCEDURE
Lead Sponsor
Cairo University
Data Source & Attribution
This clinical trial information is sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov, a service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health.
Modifications: This data has been reformatted for display purposes. Eligibility criteria have been parsed into inclusion/exclusion sections. Location data has been geocoded to enable distance-based search. For the authoritative and most current information, please visit ClinicalTrials.gov.
Neither the United States Government nor Clareo Health make any warranties regarding the data. Check ClinicalTrials.gov frequently for updates.
View ClinicalTrials.gov Terms and Conditions