Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
The Comparison of Cross Pin Configurations in the Treatment of Gartland Type III Supracondylar Humerus Fractures: 2 Pins Versus 3 Pins
The objective of this prospective randomized controlled trial is to evaluate and compare the outcome of the 2wire vs 3 wire crossed pin configurations in the management of supracondylar humeral fractures in children.
Fortyfive children with supracondylar humeral fractures were randomly divided into two groups. One group was treated with 2 crossed pins and the other group with 3 crossed pins. The mean age was 6.04±2.49 (1-12).. The follow-up period was 5 years, with no patients lost to follow up. Intervention: Twentytwo patients were managed by 2 crossed and 23 by 3 crossed pin method. All surgeries were performed by the same surgeon. Main Outcome Measurements: Postoperative stability, ulnar nerve injury, range of motions, and pin tract infections were evaluated.
Age
1 - 12 years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No
Start Date
January 15, 2015
Primary Completion Date
January 24, 2020
Completion Date
January 24, 2020
Last Updated
October 9, 2020
45
ACTUAL participants
crossed pin configuration
PROCEDURE
Lead Sponsor
Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Research and Training Hospital
NCT03759028
NCT06187584
NCT05780398
Data Source & Attribution
This clinical trial information is sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov, a service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health.
Modifications: This data has been reformatted for display purposes. Eligibility criteria have been parsed into inclusion/exclusion sections. Location data has been geocoded to enable distance-based search. For the authoritative and most current information, please visit ClinicalTrials.gov.
Neither the United States Government nor Clareo Health make any warranties regarding the data. Check ClinicalTrials.gov frequently for updates.
View ClinicalTrials.gov Terms and Conditions