High Flow Nasal Therapy Versus Noninvasive Ventilation in COPD Exacerbation

Randomized multicenter non-inferiority trial comparing High flow nasal therapy (HFNT) versus Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and acute hypercapnic respiratory failure.

The interventions will be delivered in Emergency Departments or Intensive Care Units. The intervention under investigation will be High flow nasal therapy. Investigators will deliver HFNT to enrolled patients using any available device able to produce it. The flow will be initially set at 60 liters per minute and temperature at 37° C. The target will be an oxygen saturation (SpO2) of 88-92%. In case of patient not tolerating these settings, flow and temperature will be titrated to the maximum tolerated level. The intervention will last until one of the following conditions: 1) physician in charge decide to interrupt HFNT and start NIV because the patient shows signs of persisting worsening respiratory failure; 2) physician in charge decide to interrupt HFNT and perform endotracheal intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation because patient shows one or more of these conditions: respiratory arrest, respiratory pauses with loss of consciousness, psychomotor agitation making nursing care impossible, heart rate \< 50 with loss of alertness, hemodynamic instability with systolic arterial blood pressure \<70 mmHg, development of conditions requiring intubation either to protect the airway or to manage copious tracheal secretions, inability to tolerate the devices; 3) clinical improvement defined as all these conditions: normal mental status, hemodynamic stability, respiratory rate below 25 per minute, absence of activation of accessory respiratory muscles and paradoxical abdominal motion, no dyspnea arterial pH \> 7.35, Arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) \< 70 mmHg and Arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) \> 55 mmHg with an inspired oxygen fraction (FiO2) \< 0.35. In case of temporary interruption of the intervention for any cause, patients should receive oxygen supplementation with Venturi mask with a target of SpO2 88-92%.The comparator will be non invasive ventilation (NIV). NIV must be delivered by full or oronasal mask. The ventilator settings will be decided according to the usual practice: maximal tolerated inspiratory pressure to obtain a measured or estimated expired tidal volume of 6-8 mL·kg-1 of body weight and a positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) between 3 and 5 cmH2O. An interface rotational strategy will be allowed among only different types of masks. The intervention will last until one of the following conditions: 1) physician in charge decide to interrupt NIV and perform endotracheal intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation because patient shows one or more of these conditions: respiratory arrest, respiratory pauses with loss of consciousness, psychomotor agitation making nursing care impossible, heart rate \< 50 with loss of alertness, hemodynamic instability with systolic arterial blood pressure \<70 mmHg, development of conditions requiring intubation either to protect the airway or to manage copious tracheal secretions, inability to tolerate the devices; 2) clinical improvement defined as all these conditions: normal mental status, hemodynamic stability, respiratory rate below 25 per minute, absence of activation of accessory respiratory muscles and paradoxical abdominal motion, no dyspnoea arterial pH \> 7.35, Arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) \< 70 mmHg and Arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) \> 55 mmHg with an inspired oxygen fraction (FiO2) \< 0.35. In case of temporary interruption of NIV for any cause, patients should receive oxygen supplementation with Venturi mask with a target of SpO2 88-92%.