Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
The study will compare therapeutic efficacy of a novel spinal cord stimulation leads implant based on anatomical landmarks with standard surgical implantation technique.
The primary purpose of this study is to compare the therapeutic efficacy of the conventional, paresthesia mapping-based burst spinal cord stimulation (SCS) implantation strategy to a more novel, anatomic midline-based approach that has the potential to streamline the workflow associated with the SCS treatment continuum.
Age
18 - No limit years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No
Seacroft Hospital
Leeds, Yorkshire and the Humber, United Kingdom
St. Thomas Hospital
London, United Kingdom
Start Date
November 1, 2016
Primary Completion Date
August 19, 2019
Completion Date
August 19, 2019
Last Updated
May 3, 2021
60
ACTUAL participants
Paresthesia mapping lead evaluation first
DEVICE
Anatomical midline lead evaluation first
DEVICE
Lead Sponsor
Abbott Medical Devices
Collaborators
Data Source & Attribution
This clinical trial information is sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov, a service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health.
Modifications: This data has been reformatted for display purposes. Eligibility criteria have been parsed into inclusion/exclusion sections. Location data has been geocoded to enable distance-based search. For the authoritative and most current information, please visit ClinicalTrials.gov.
Neither the United States Government nor Clareo Health make any warranties regarding the data. Check ClinicalTrials.gov frequently for updates.
View ClinicalTrials.gov Terms and ConditionsNCT06219408