Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
Erich Arch Bars vs. IMF Screws for Placement of Maxillomandibular Fixation: Which is More Time Effective in the Operating Room Setting?
Determining the cost effectiveness, based on the time duration of application, of two methods of wiring the jaws together during surgery to repair mandible fractures. One technique is more expensive but faster in application, while the other is less expensive and takes more time to apply.
Purpose: To identify which option of wiring the jaws together during treatment of mandible fractures is more cost effective to the patient, Erich arch bars or IMF (Intermaxillary Fixation) screws. Patients who sustain mandible fractures that meet the inclusion criteria will be randomized to one of the two treatment types listed above. The overall treatment in both categories is consistent with the standard of care, the only difference being the method utilized to achieve intermaxillary fixation during the course of the surgery.
Age
18 - 70 years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No
Christiana Care Hospital
Newark, Delaware, United States
Wilmington Hospital
Wilmington, Delaware, United States
Start Date
July 1, 2013
Primary Completion Date
April 1, 2015
Completion Date
April 1, 2015
Last Updated
June 28, 2017
5
ACTUAL participants
IMF Screws
DEVICE
Erich Arch Bars
DEVICE
Lead Sponsor
Christiana Care Health Services
Data Source & Attribution
This clinical trial information is sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov, a service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health.
Modifications: This data has been reformatted for display purposes. Eligibility criteria have been parsed into inclusion/exclusion sections. Location data has been geocoded to enable distance-based search. For the authoritative and most current information, please visit ClinicalTrials.gov.
Neither the United States Government nor Clareo Health make any warranties regarding the data. Check ClinicalTrials.gov frequently for updates.
View ClinicalTrials.gov Terms and ConditionsNCT06895174