Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
A Single-centre Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial of Zirconia-based Versus Metal-based Adhesive Bridges for Replacing 2 Missing Teeth or Less in Adults.
Adhesive bridges are becoming popular in patients with congenitally missing teeth and these are type of bridges that can be done with only minimal or with no preparation to replace the missing tooth/teeth. The best clinical gain is the minimal tooth preparation or no need for the removal of tooth substance. Treatment for this type of bridges does not usually require anaesthesia. In addition, adhesive bridges can provide reasonable aesthetical outcome with minimal cost and reduced chair time. The biggest issue is that high failure rate in the long term, and gray colour shining through the metal wing cemented onto the abutment tooth. This can compromise the aesthetical outcome. The aesthetical problem can be solved by the use of zirconia all ceramic material to construct the bridge.
Age
18 - 80 years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Barts and The London, School of Medicine and Dentistry
London, United Kingdom
Start Date
April 1, 2012
Primary Completion Date
April 1, 2018
Completion Date
April 1, 2018
Last Updated
September 26, 2022
Zirconia-based adhesive bridge
PROCEDURE
Metal-based adhesive bridge
PROCEDURE
Lead Sponsor
Queen Mary University of London
NCT07080177
NCT06602154
Data Source & Attribution
This clinical trial information is sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov, a service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health.
Modifications: This data has been reformatted for display purposes. Eligibility criteria have been parsed into inclusion/exclusion sections. Location data has been geocoded to enable distance-based search. For the authoritative and most current information, please visit ClinicalTrials.gov.
Neither the United States Government nor Clareo Health make any warranties regarding the data. Check ClinicalTrials.gov frequently for updates.
View ClinicalTrials.gov Terms and ConditionsNCT06178796