Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
Differences in Morbidity Frequency Between a Necessity Endotracheal Suctioning Protocol Versus a Routine Endotracheal Suctioning Protocol in Hospital Pablo Tobon Uribe´s Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU). A Randomized Controlled Trial
Morbidity frequency associated to a endotracheal suctioning is different between a necessity endotracheal suctioning protocol versus a routine endotracheal protocol.
Endotracheal aspiration is a very useful procedure. It has several adverse events every time that aspiration is practiced. This trials wants to identify which protocol (necessity versus routine) could be better to practice in pediatrics intensive care unit with less risk.
Age
0 - 14 years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No
Hospital Pablo Tobon Uribe
Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia
Start Date
February 1, 2010
Primary Completion Date
August 1, 2010
Completion Date
August 1, 2010
Last Updated
September 11, 2017
92
ACTUAL participants
Necessity endotracheal suctioning
PROCEDURE
Routine endotracheal suctioning
PROCEDURE
Lead Sponsor
Hospital Pablo Tobón Uribe
Data Source & Attribution
This clinical trial information is sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov, a service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health.
Modifications: This data has been reformatted for display purposes. Eligibility criteria have been parsed into inclusion/exclusion sections. Location data has been geocoded to enable distance-based search. For the authoritative and most current information, please visit ClinicalTrials.gov.
Neither the United States Government nor Clareo Health make any warranties regarding the data. Check ClinicalTrials.gov frequently for updates.
View ClinicalTrials.gov Terms and Conditions