Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
Single Port vs Tree Trocars Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Many feasibility studies have been published on Single Port surgery, but no comparative studies have shown any advantages compared to standard laparoscopy. The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes and economical issues of laparoscopic cholecystectomies using single port transumbilical approach and three trocars.
Design: * Prospective Randomized Controlled trial * Population analysis based on Intention To Treat * Patient and data analyzer blinded (double-blind trial) Outcomes observed: * Primary: pain * Secondaries: overall operative time, complication rate, cost-effectiveness analysis, cosmetic evaluation, quality of life, CO2 consumption Nbr of patients included: 260 Port used: Triport, Olympus
Age
18 - 75 years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No
University Hospital of Lausanne
Lausanne, Switzerland
Start Date
September 1, 2009
Primary Completion Date
September 1, 2017
Completion Date
September 1, 2018
Last Updated
October 17, 2018
268
ACTUAL participants
Single Trocar CCK
PROCEDURE
Standard CCK
PROCEDURE
Lead Sponsor
University of Lausanne Hospitals
NCT07002619
NCT03812718
Data Source & Attribution
This clinical trial information is sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov, a service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health.
Modifications: This data has been reformatted for display purposes. Eligibility criteria have been parsed into inclusion/exclusion sections. Location data has been geocoded to enable distance-based search. For the authoritative and most current information, please visit ClinicalTrials.gov.
Neither the United States Government nor Clareo Health make any warranties regarding the data. Check ClinicalTrials.gov frequently for updates.
View ClinicalTrials.gov Terms and Conditions