Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
The Impact of an Automated Telephone Intervention on HbA1c in Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Aim 1. Determine the impact of a daily, automated telephone intervention on HbA1c levels compared to standard care in older patients with type 2 diabetes. Aim 2. Determine the impact of the automated telephone intervention compared to standard care on adherence to prescribed SMBG frequency in older patients with type 2 diabetes. Aim 3. Determine the impact of the automated telephone intervention compared to standard care on self-reported diabetic control problems in older patients with type 2 diabetes. Aim 4. Determine the impact of the automated telephone intervention compared to standard care on self-reported attitudes and health beliefs concerning diabetes in older patients with type 2 diabetes
Age
55 - No limit years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No
Primary Care Center University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Start Date
June 1, 2007
Primary Completion Date
June 1, 2008
Completion Date
June 1, 2008
Last Updated
February 22, 2013
120
ACTUAL participants
automated telephone intervention vs. usual care
BEHAVIORAL
Lead Sponsor
University of Minnesota
Collaborators
Data Source & Attribution
This clinical trial information is sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov, a service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health.
Modifications: This data has been reformatted for display purposes. Eligibility criteria have been parsed into inclusion/exclusion sections. Location data has been geocoded to enable distance-based search. For the authoritative and most current information, please visit ClinicalTrials.gov.
Neither the United States Government nor Clareo Health make any warranties regarding the data. Check ClinicalTrials.gov frequently for updates.
View ClinicalTrials.gov Terms and ConditionsNCT06671587