Finding studies
Finding studies
Take this into the appointment.
Saves the questions and what to expect into your notes, next to the visit they belong to.
Lead
University College, London
With
OBJECTIVES: Primary * Compare the progression-free survival and overall survival of patients with locally advanced or metastatic prostate cancer treated with transcutaneous estrogen patches vs luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogues. Secondary * Compare the cardiovascular system-related morbidity and mortality in patients treated with these regimens * Compare the activity of these treatments, in terms of castrate level of hormones, failure-free survival, and biochemical failure, in these patients. * Compare other toxicities, including osteoporosis, hot flushes, gynecomastia, and anemia, in patients treated with these regimens. * Compare the quality of life of patients treated with these regimens. OUTLINE: This is a randomized, controlled, multicenter study. Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms at 1(control):1 (patch) ratio. * Arm I (control): Patients receive luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists as per local practice in the absence of unacceptable toxicity. * Arm II (patch): Patients receive 4 transcutaneous estrogen patches, changing twice weekly for 4 weeks. Patients' testosterone levels are measured at week 4. Patients whose testosterone level is \> 1.7 nmol/L continue to receive patch as before and have their testosterone level measured every 2 weeks. Patients whose testosterone level is \< 1.7 nmol/L at week 4 or any other point receive 3 transcutaneous estrogen patches changed twice weekly in the absence of unacceptable toxicity. Quality of life is assessed at baseline; at weeks 4, 8, and 12; every 3 months for 24 months. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed periodically. Peer Reviewed and Funded or Endorsed by Cancer Research UK PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 2200 patients will be accrued for this study.
Age
0–120
Sex
MALE
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted
